Moon Anomalies: Page 2

The Moon - gazed upon for countless centuries by lovers in all seasons, used by farmers to illuminate their nighttime harvesting in the autumn, cursed by soldiers trying to sneak up on the enemy and looked upon with awe by first time young astronomers. The Moon has almost always presented a familiar if not friendly countenance peering down upon us with serene familiarity.

The Moon may harbour five times more water than we thought, reckon researchers in the United States who have doubled previous estimates of how much of the lunar surface is permanently dark. This is encouraging news for those in favour of human colonization of the Moon. Any ice that accumulated in sunless pits on the Moon billions of years ago would still be frozen there, having never sublimed and floated free of the tenuous gravity, explain Ben Bussey, of the University of Hawaii, and his colleagues.

This site is dedicated to the examination of unusual features on the surface of the Moon, with the possibility in mind that some of them might be artificial. Available at this site are images from Lunar Orbiter, Apollo and Clementine spacecraft. We will, where possible, provide supporting data for the images and spacecraft, and links to the appropriate web sites for further information.

This first photo, NASA# a11_h_40_5903, is directly from a NASA Website. It is a fairly standard looking astronaut photo until compared to another photo (shown below) which was most likely taken within a few moments.

Moon Anomalies and Lunar news.

i've been seeking more scientific opinions on the moon so we can try and reconcile what we see with what we know in the hope of making sense of this situation. The following is an email response. Mr. Lunsford gave permission to post it:

Moon Links

More detailed photography has simply complicated the problem. Most astronomers simply gloss over the anomalous evidence that has come to light, or if probed more deeply, debunk and ridicule it. It is an unfortunate fact of human nature that, when our established world view is threatened, we lash out venomously. Scientists are no exception, in fact doubly so, as they have their own specialised knowledge to protect. Cosmic Conspiracies are open to ideas until they are proven erroneous.

1. Moon’s Age: The moon is far older than previously expected. Maybe even older than the Earth or the Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older. 2. Rock’s Origin: The chemical composition of the dust upon which the rocks sat differed remarkably from the rocks themselves, contrary to accepted theories that the dust resulted from weathering and breakup of the rocks themselves. The rocks had to have come from somewhere else.

(Conspiracy Nation, 8/9/03) -- Authors Mary Bennett and David S. Percy offer what they term the "dark moon scenario" as the most likely explanation behind NASA's alleged journey to the moon. In their book, Dark Moon, Bennett and Percy admit that yes, NASA went to the moon, "but neither in the manner that NASA have claimed as set out in the historical record, nor with the individuals named in the historical record." (emphasis added) Before delving into Bennett and Percy's explanation of what actually happened, here are some brief moon anomalies noted by Charles Fort (1874-1932) in his book, New Lands.