Tim, absolutely true what you say.
And Sightings of aliens/ufos have increased exponentially ALONG with the worldwide proliferation of available technology. It's so strange. More cellphones with their onboard cameras naturally produces more footage to upload onto the Millions of Pcs which make the dissemination of information and footage quicker and easier than ever before to the millions of eager viewers.
We have been given the equipment to inform ourselves of what's going on. But by whom?
If our recent technology HAS come from alien sources, as many believe it has, and is 'drip fed' to the worldwide marketplace each year as the technology unravels, then it seems so coincidental that the items we are permitted to buy right now on our planet can be used :
a) to readily film and record real ufo activity we might see.
b) To FAKE ufos and aliens, if we 'choose' to do so.
c) To then share via the WEB what we have recorded with perhaps millions of potential 'participants' who share our experience vicariously, whether it be REAL or IMAGINED.
I wonder why these particular inventions are with us? There are now untold MILLIONS of camera phones and PCs on the planet's surface. (Who would have thought of combining a phone with a camera? Where did that idea come from?)
And not only is the technology cabable of being put to the above uses, it IS being put to these uses.
wITHIN OUR MINDS THERE EXISTS a creative, intelligent, sympathetic and understanding capability, whose function is to fabricate non-real scenes and scenarios, for purposes we can only guess at. This may be conceived as a parallel personality to our conscious personality. Let's call it 'the producer'.
'The producer' also has access not only to all of our sensory input, both conscious and unconscious, but also to all our emotional attitudes and concerns. The 'producer' - think of this - may also have access (whether constant or when the need arises) to information NOT available to our conscious minds, maybe events occurring out of our reach in SPACE and TIME, INCLUDING EVENTS THAT HAVE NOT YET OCCURRED.
Using this material, the 'producer' could create fantasies consisting largely let's say, of representations of people: these may be persons alive or from the past, or stereotypes whose identity is evident (i.e: The Madonna?), or an extraterrestrial ALIEN.
Bu can our imaginations conceive of something that does not exist? Or never existed? Or is completely fictional? I don't think so. I think that anything you THINK, can BE.
Think of the mid sixties and Star Trek. Those 'communicating devices' used by Kirk and his crew. They were cell phones, basically. Science fiction then, now we all have them. The script writer was maybe 'tapping' into the future.
pERHAPS THE CREATION OF THESE SCENES and the 'entities' depicted are created at specific times for specific purposes???
What if an external 'agency' was responsible for this process, providing the correct emotional drive in such cases? All that would be required is that the 'percipient' be in a suitable receptive state.
Now maybe An ENTITY sighting is just one of several op[tions whereby the subconscious personality can influence our conscious minds. Take for instance the cell phone phenomenom, the hoax and spoof clip, maybe when a VISUAL DISPLAY seems - for whatever reason - to be the most appropriate or the most effective way at the time of presenting information to the audience of CONSCIOUS minds.
What causes the entity experience to occur? Who chooses the moment, and for what reasons.
Is there a need? a state of mind? A CONNECTION that takes place? A 'prompt'?
The production of imagery is going on all the time in our brains. The more primitive, older parts of our brain I believe may be in 'numbed communication' with external sources of command and control (for better words). We say our society is 'out of tune' with nature, maybe that is EXACTLY what we are.
But when we ARE attuned, we see more of the TRUTH. We subconsciously know that so we maybe 'HOAX', or play mind games, in an attempt to stimulate actuality.
I know this is getting confused here so I think I need to sort out the wording.
But if anyone is getting a flavour of what I'm getting at, please put in your ten cents worth and help me clarify if you can.