UFOSeek Forum

Community for discussion of UFO, Paranormal and mysterious topics
It is currently Mon Dec 16, 2019 11:27 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 1:20 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:03 am
Posts: 5765
Location: Foothills of Hollywood, CA
I doubt there is any legal recourse, whatsoever. Unless the area already has a legal clause for just such inconveniences incorporated in the City or the Province's Laws, I'm afraid PROVING the house is haunted is about as easy as proving UFOs landed on your front lawn without permission.

_________________
Some days are DIAMONDS; some days are STONES!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 7:22 pm 
Unregistered
I am the owner of the above mentioned home. Not only are we left with a home we can not live in but our realtor has told us that if we dont shut up about it they will sue us! They have also told members of the media that we lied and have disconnected our phone and left town. Which is untrue. They said they would help and then they would not even answer our calls. This is real and it is really happening to us. We are a young family and we have been forever changed by this experience.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 7:53 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:50 pm
Posts: 4426
Location: Near Toronto, Ontario Canada
Oh rchapman,

I really feel for you. This is a terrible position you are in. What is very real to you, was also real to many others, yet, not disclosed. At least had somebody said something, you could have made an informed decision.

Talk about blindsided.

I do think that because it is not something 'legal', with regard to what realtors normally have to disclose, it would be impossible to prove. And, even at that, who would think to ask their realtor when they're going through a house they're considering buying, "Um, excuse me, but are you aware of any information that might indicate this house is haunted?". And even at that, if they say 'no', how can you prove otherwise.

I am really glad you posted here. Perhaps there are some here who can offer some suggestions and thoughts on this that you may not have yet considered.

Best of luck to you,

Tim

_________________
I have absolutely nothing clever to say......but I'm workin' on it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 8:51 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:03 am
Posts: 5765
Location: Foothills of Hollywood, CA
Perhaps this will read as a grim, bitter-sweet idea ... but there are lots of ghost hunters who look for tour guide brochures of haunted places, just for the thrill of staying there a night or two.

This may not salve your wounds of being misled by the real estate agent, but perhaps you can recuperate some of your losses by renting out the home/property to tourists, or international ghost hunters who LOVE to go around and set up sophisticated equipment for a specified length of time, just for the thrill of possibly capturing anomalies in photos and electronic sensors.

I know that this doesn't legally help you in your quest for justice ... but charging people to "enter and stay at their own risks" might be an option you can pursue. You'd have to have a little different liability insurance, probably, but if you can't live in the house, and you can't sell it, perhaps the brave-hearted souls who have the dollars to be thrill-seekers can at least help you financially.

_________________
Some days are DIAMONDS; some days are STONES!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:59 am
Posts: 76
Location: City of Redcliffe, just North of Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Here is an idea, challenge the Realtor in Civil Court on the premise that he/she should stay a week, working from the house in question, to "prove"it is not haunted, if the Realtor refuses then you have 2 answers, 1) the Realtor knew about the "Haunted House" reputation all along and thus supplied goods under false pretenses (defined by saying they did not know about the "Haunting"
and 2) The Realtor themselves believes in ghosts and by refusing to stay there is admitting that they lied about the house to ensure the sale... (the lie being that they denied knowing about its reputation)

while nothing could come of the court case in Criminal Law, under Civil Law at least the contract could be declared null and void, the owners might be able to get their money back.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:54 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:03 am
Posts: 5765
Location: Foothills of Hollywood, CA
Good advice... :o

_________________
Some days are DIAMONDS; some days are STONES!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:45 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:50 pm
Posts: 4426
Location: Near Toronto, Ontario Canada
The only problem I see with that is, the onus is on the purchaser to prove that the realtor knew the house was haunted, and, they have to prove that. It wouldn't be up to the reator to prove them right.

But, I cannot see why disclosure is such a big deal. Makes me think that that is proof in itself. I suspect that there have been other major issues with other owners of that house as well.

Tim

_________________
I have absolutely nothing clever to say......but I'm workin' on it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB