UFOSeek Forum

Community for discussion of UFO, Paranormal and mysterious topics
It is currently Sat Nov 18, 2017 11:14 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:21 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:59 am
Posts: 1853
Location: Canada
Let's try this one more time.......

The magnets allow for focus, that is their primary purpose, that's all they do.

But focus is everything in terms of physical mass and or structure.

The field of the craft and the field of the earth are not opposite.
In fact they are the same, but one is more highly energized than the other.

Because the craft is so much smaller than the earth it has a much higher ratio of energy per unit of mass.
And because the underlying force of energy associated with the craft can be modulated by the focusing of the magnetic frame the ratio of energy can be increased or decreased in relation to the energy of the craft and the energy of the earth.

So the magnets, the magnetic frame is like a tap which regulates the flow of energy to the core of the system through focus. Increase the flow and the energy of the system increases, decrease the flow of energy and the energy of the system decreases.

The differential in energy existing between the two is what counts.
The energy is inherent to any system and or energy is inherent to any system in terms of an inversely balanced field structure, which is one with inversely balanced internal and external dynamics.

The energy itself is ever present in relation to any unified field structure, (a balanced field structure), so in relation to the operation of the craft it is the modulation of that energy which controls the energy differential existing between the craft and the environment in which the craft is operating.

An atom of hydrogen is a unified field system, the earth is a unified field system, the sun is a unified field system, the craft is a unified field system.

A non-uniform differential exists between any two or more unified field systems.

In relation to our existence on this earth, we exist within a uniform field of frequency, but all other systems such as the moon, sun etc. represent non-uniform fields of frequency which are capable of distorting the uniform field of our earth.

If we change our system of reference by means of field frequency modulation we can achieve uniform access to another system. At that point we are in a uniform field of that system to which we have accessed and now the earth represents a non-uniform field of frequency which is capable of distorting the uniform field of the planet or moon which we have uniformly accessed.

Nibble and chew thoroughly before swallowing.
___


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:06 pm 
Unregistered
I will re read this last post every night before bed time and well discuss it further in a month or two.....take a break......er sorry dave....
But leaving the theory aside for a post, what would be the simplest form of a structure which could focus the required magnetic forces?
What kind of strength of magnets do you suppose it would take?
The simplest of magnetic frames....
Could it be produced for say 5.000$
50,00$? what is required in the magnets themselves?Any special metals or composites?
I am thinking of speaker magnets say, or some other application from which we could borrow the gear......They are round and formed of composite, but very strong.....
Do you think theres any chance that W.Smiths got some papers stashed away somewhere?
If one wanted to produce this listening device.....say even communicate eventually, what would it require to make a space radio?
I am still not sure how electromagnetics will work around this field thing as the saucers seem to shut down some forms of it...Thus negating the available control electronics or even the use of precomputed programs and such...(unless the interior electrics of or saucer are part of its uniform field and so work as predicted for such devices.)?

Where does this view of the multiverse leave the Higgs Boson particle by the way?
[cool]no, dont answer that.....it was an "in"joke(to which most of us ,including me,are not as yet privy)

Klatch-Remoo buddy.....
bergle
___


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 2:04 pm 
Unregistered
maybe this http://mfluxdrive.awardspace.com/ can help to.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:26 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:59 am
Posts: 1853
Location: Canada
One day someone is going to get this right and actually demonstrate anti=gravity.

So far they have it backwards and as you might have noticed it will only work as long as you keep it plugged in.

That is why we have a site like http://gravitycontrol.org and a book called Unity.

Oh yes, its free if you want to down/load the book.

The problem is that you have to start from the starting point if you want to achieve gravity control and few people are willing to do that. Most want to know the answers before they ask the questions, which makes no sense at all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:05 am 
Unregistered
It's been a year since I've been here. Funny that it happens to be around the same time. Anyways, any updates in your research? Any prototypes? What is the latest?


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:40 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:59 am
Posts: 1853
Location: Canada
Check out the Casing Report over at the gravitycontrol free energy blog, its pretty amazing.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

cron
Powered by phpBB