UFOSeek Forum

[crazy] Nice pics you showed. The birds could be taken for a mothman I guess.
Although I don't think they are as tall as a man is unless its a short man. One
witness I spoke with said the critter was a good head taller than he was, which
would have made the critter over 7ft. The statue at the town does not seem to
fit the id's I heard. After 3 days my wife decided she didnt want to visit the town
any longer so we came back to Clarksburg. Then we find out that something similar
was spotted in Salem Wv which is only 15 miles from here. Strange.

Pease excuse my posts as I have not learned what to do with them yet.
___

You seem to be doing a good job of communicating unless im really whacked.....
What part of that didnt i understand?hehehe
What if any details at all did you get from the neighbouring town where you went next?
You know how the people in one town talk about the people in the towns nearby!teehee
Any indicaTIONS THAT THE MOTHMAN MAY BE INDIGEHOUS TO A WIDER AREA THAN THE ORIGONAL PLACE?
yOU SEEM TO BE INTIMATING SO......
If so what and how much gossip did you hear?
Your reportage is fine by me except details sound like they were gard to come by......
say on slohand.....were happy to get what little you did manage to gleen.
actually try to give us what descriptions you did get even if theyve been published i want to hear what the people you spoke with said....they were there for the show.....
the authors who wrote the books simply werent.....
thanks
bergle
___

[crazy] Yo Bergle
I'll try to remember some of the details of my visit to the town in
my next post. At the time I had just returned from Nam and had
other things on my mind. I'll try to piece it togeather tomorrow

slohand

[tongue] Hi Bergle

Looked for other descriptions of mothman on the net. Found that most all of them
followed the same route from the eye witnesses. I'm afraid I can't add to much to
their accounts. An old friend of mine named Gray Barker did some investigating
into the matter. But Gray was a modern P.T. Barnum and would sometimes invent
things to sell books. His investigation didn't do much either.
Everything I've learned so far still leads me to believe that the mothman was a
reincarnated pterasaur. The height was in excess of 7 ft. Now if a 4 ft. pterasaur
had a 10ft wing span, and they were folded up with the critter perched in a tree
or on the ground, the wings would be above the head which would give it the extra
height. The red eyes I'm not sure of, but who knows what color eyes a pterasaur had.
Critters have been seen in PA. Md. NY and Ohio that fit the pterasaur profile. Are they
really extinct? I can't answer that one. When human footprints have been found
along side of dino prints, I'm not sure of anything anymore.
___

Did that turn out to be verified?
The human footprints?i heard that a long time ago but no follow up.when i dont hear things twice from separate sources.....i soon forget them ......your post just brought it up again!
what cha got?
The pterosaur could be stll hanging in there in certain conditions maybe, but give this a thought.
The damn thing is seven feet taLL....OK 4 FEET.
HOW MUCH ENERGY DOES A BIRD THAT SIZE NEED TO FLY?
HOW DOES THat translate onto food?
i estimate a bird such sized must consume a vast quantity of meat or other high protien food to survive each day, let alone winter.....
what kind of prey?
it goesnt matter,but you would think that the thing would be seen more often hunting no?
just a thought.......bergle
___

[crazy] Hi Bergie

Point taken on the amount of energy that thing would need to live or fly. But the
birds in the pictures you showed seem to find the food to survive. I always wondered
about the wintering thing because most of the sightings were in Nov and Dec. WV is
cold that time of the year. There was snow when this took place.
I guess the fossilized human prints alongside the dinosaur prints were verified. It would be
difficult to put human prints in solid stone and not leave some evidence that it was done.
This is not the only time or place that this has occured. This is way beyond science
thinking so you will not see it advertised. In my next post I'll give you a link to the site
where they are being excavated. there are plenty of pictures.

slohand
___

Most excellent!
The very apearance of fotprints mixed with dino prints blows most time lines out of the water................
What i meant by verified, is if a major universit, real professor or other establishment org. has recgnized theyre real...you know what im looking for......
just for arguments sake,i may want to scream it at some idiot someday....heh heh
long day pal ill get back later.....bergle
___

[tongue]Hi Bergle

Heres the web site I was telling you about. www.rae.org/ Just scroll down till
you come to Puluxy river excavation. If you've never been to this web site, it
will keep you busy for a long time and may even change your way of thinking. Have fun

Slohand
___

Still visiting this large syte....thank you.bergle
___

[crazy]Hi Bergle

Hope you enjoy the web site. There are other sites with pictures also. I'll try to find
the links for you.
Of course you know that no narrow minded scientists would admit that these prints
are for real. That would change the scientific thinking of evolution which they think
they have down pat.

slohand
___